Legal Opinion

Reddick v. Newburn

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1882PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Andrew Circuit Court.—IIon. H. S. Kelley, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtHough, C. J.

Defendant had possession and control of a pasture in which about fifty head of stock belonging to himself and others, were pastured. This stock broke down the fences dividing the pasture from the adjacent cornfields and entered said fields and destroyed the crops of the plaintiff. Judgment was rendered against the defendant for the entire damage.

The defendant contends that he is liable only for the damage done by his own cattle.

Where cattle are straying upon the commons, or are otherwise at large, and break through a lawful fence and destroy crops, each owner is separately liable for the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chipman v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Auchmuty v. HamCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  3. Van Steenburgh v. TobiasNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  4. Partenheimer v. Van OrderNew York Supreme Court · 1855
  5. Cook v. MoreaIndiana Supreme Court · 1870

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fitterling v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  2. Cunningham v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Jackson v. FultonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. R. Becker & Degen v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Rieper v. RieperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API