Legal Opinion
Bowker v. Haight & Freese Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
Decided May 26, 1906PublishedCited by 4 opinions
On Motion by the Receivers to Compel Mr. Franklin Bien to Pay Over to Them the Sum of $2,000.
1Opinion of the Court
LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.
There is no dispute as to the facts, and the conclusion to be drawn from such facts is abundantly settled by authority. The Haight & Freese Company was a corporation, with which, prior to May 9, 1905, Mr.„Bien apparently had no business relations. It was a New York corporation, had its principal office and transacted business here, and had a branch office in Boston. On May 8, 1905, the United States Circuit Court in Massachusetts, in an action brought in that court, appointed Mr. James D. Colt a receiver of the property of the corporation within that jurisdiction. On…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Attorney-General v. Continental Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Florence Mining Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
3Cited by4 opinions
- Leach v. Mechanics Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- In re HollinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- McClain v. TorkelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Price v. Horrigan Contracting Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1915