Legal Opinion
Harisay v. Clarno
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided October 8, 2020No. S066576PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
116 Argued and submitted March 6, decision of Court of Appeals and judgment of circuit court affirmed October 8, 2020 Richard HARISAY, Charles Montgomery, and Stephen Bintliff, Chief Petitioners and Electors of the State of Oregon, Petitioners on Review, v. Bev CLARNO, Secretary of State of Oregon, Respondent on Review. (CC 14C21951) (CA A158925) (SC S066576)
474 P3d 378
Plaintiffs brought a civil action against the Secretary of State to require the secretary to certify an initiative petition that purported to exercise the peo- ple’s right “to propose laws” by initiative under Article IV,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- National Prohibition CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Priest v. PearceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Leser v. GarnettSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Hawke v. Smith (No. 1)Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. FarnhamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- Bowers v. BetschartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- Gutierrez v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022