Sanderlin v. Sanderlin's Adm'r
Tennessee Supreme Court
The manner of proceeding, and the facts in this case are fully set forth in the opinion. At the September term, 1850, of the circuit court for Shelby county, Humph keys, Judge, presiding, the judgment of the county court was affirmed, and the plaintiff appealed in error.
1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.
This is an application for a year’s support, under the statutes, by the plaintiff in error, who is the widow of the defendant’s intestate.
It appears from the record, that at the May term of the county court of Shelby, 1850, commissioners were appointed to lay off a year’s support for the plaintiff. At the July term of the court, the commissioners made their report, designating the following articles for the support of the widow, viz: twenty-five barrels of corn, two barrels of flour, twenty-five pounds of coffee, fifty pounds of lard, twenty pounds of candles, three hundred pounds of bacon,…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Redmon v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1939
- Hall v. JeffersCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990