Whitney v. . Thomas
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
It is unnecessary to pass upon the validity of the redemption set up by the plaintiffs in this case. There are other conclusive objections to the title of the defendant. Assuming that the act of 1855 (Sess. Laws of 1855, p. 793, § 65) applies to the conveyance executed by the Comptroller to Mr. Lansing in January, 1856, such conveyance is made by that act presumptive evidence merely of the regularity of the sale and previous proceedings. This evidence is liable to be rebutted by proof that the assessment of the tax, or any other portion of the proceedings prior to the conveyance, was…
2Cited by39 opinions
- National Bank of Chemung v. City of ElmiraNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Abbott v. LindenbowerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1868
- Kiamesha Development Corp. v. Guild Properties, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1958
- People v. . HagadornNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Cruger v. . DoughertyNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.