AUGUSTINE BY AUGUSTINE v. Delgado
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
Appellants contend that the lower court erred in (1) permitting the testimony of Dr. Naeye, one of appellees’ expert witnesses; (2) excluding a significant part of the deposition of Dr. Perkins, one of appellants’ experts; and (3) allowing defense counsel to aver an “unfavorable inference” from appellants’ failure to call certain expert witnesses. Upon thorough review of the record and complete exploration of appellants’ claims, we conclude that there was no error and, accordingly, affirm.
The record reveals the following facts: On October 1, 1975, appellant Joanne Augustine…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Kemp v. QuallsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Gill v. McGraw Electric Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Laubach v. HaighSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Kubit v. RussSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Wilkes-Barre Iron & Wire Works, Inc. v. Pargas of Wilkes-Barre, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Butler v. KIWI, SASuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Poleri v. SalkindSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Feingold v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Jones v. ConstantinoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.