Legal Opinion

Small v. Small

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 15, 1992No. 9126DC739PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

In Paradise Lost John Milton described Hell as “confusion worst confounded.” This proceeding, we dare not call it a case or a cause, has confused and confounded the parties, the lawyers and the trial judge. Now it confounds us. Despite the obviously well intentioned efforts of the trial lawyers and the trial court, the focus of this legal proceeding has become lost within the complex details of the financial affairs of the parties. The judgment itself as well as the errors assigned thereto by the parties on appeal reflects the loss of direction by all involved.

In a trial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davis v. Vintage Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Heating & Air Conditioning Associates, Inc. v. MyerlyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Rosenthal's Bootery, Inc. v. ShavitzCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pittman v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  2. Belk ex rel. Belk v. BelkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  3. In re BullockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  4. Bookman v. Britthaven, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API