Legal Opinion

Andrew v. Dubeau

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 14, 1958PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDubord, J.

This is a bill in equity brought to impress certain land and buildings owned by the defendants, William R. Stanton and Lucy A. Stanton, with a lien provided for by Section 34, Chapter 178, R. S., 1954.

It is alleged that certain materials sold by the plaintiffs to the other defendant, Ernest A. Dubeau, a building contractor, were used by Dubeau in repairs on the Stanton property.

The plaintiff sought to recover the amount of $564.29 for materials alleged to have been furnished between October 25, 1956 and November 16, 1956.

The defendant, Ernest A. Dubeau, filed no appearance and the bill was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1949
  2. Trask v. ChaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1910
  3. Woodsum v. Portland RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1949
  4. Wolf v. W. S. Jordan Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
  5. J. W. White Co. v. GriffithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Layrite Products Company v. LuxIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  2. MUTUAL LUMBER COMPANY v. GeroSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968
  3. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Eastern Trust & Banking Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1960
  4. E. A. Thompson Lumber Co. v. HealdSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API