Poindexter v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
Melvin Poindexter appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Burns, J.) denying his motion to reduce his term of imprisonment pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Poindexter argued that he had been sentenced based on a sentencing range subsequently reduced by Amendment 591 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines. The District Court concluded that the sentencing court had complied with Amendment 591 in selecting the applicable offense guideline, and so Poindexter was not entitled to relief under § 3582(c)(2). For the reasons that follow, we…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Matthew Mark MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Herminio Cortorreal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- United States v. FullwoodCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- United States v. George RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Rodriguez PenaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. KylesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Bowman v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- United States v. GregoryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- United States v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Mock v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.