Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Barnes

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 29, 1998No. 2-96-321-CR, 2-96-322 CR, 2-96-323CRPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRIGHAM, Justice.

Introduction and Background

Appellant Elton Ray Barnes was indicted, in three separate indictments, for the offenses of indecency with a child and aggravated sexual assault of a child. He filed a pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus asserting that the trial court had an obligation to discharge him under articles 32.01 and 28.061 of the code of criminal procedure because the State had not timely indicted him. The trial court conducted a hearing at which it found that the State had failed to timely indict appellant but had demonstrated good cause for its failure…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Ex Parte HargettCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Tatum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Young v. DretkeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  2. Ex Parte OkereCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  3. Lopez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
  4. Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999
  5. Cameron v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API