Conner v. Canter

The appellant, in his complaint against the appellee, alleged that on the 24th day of May, 1894, the appellee was a candidate for the office of treasurer of Clark county, and that on that day he entered into an agreement with the appellant, that if •elected he would appoint appellant deputy treasurer of said county, beginning on the 1st day of January, 1895, and pay him for the services to be rendered the *691sum of $75.00 per month; and that appellant agreed to perform the duties of such deputy.

It is further averred that the appellee was duly elected to such office, and qualified as such…