Legal Opinion

Glass v. Harwell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 3, 1929No. 19292PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pur Curiam.

According to the petition, the alleged indebtedness declared on accrued during two terms served by the plaintiff as deputy marshal of the City of Atlanta. To recover the same the plaintiff sued upon two pre-election contracts alleged to have been made between him and the defendant in different election years, by the terms of which the defendant would become a candidate for the office of marshal and the plaintiff would run on the ticket with *404him as deputy, with the understanding that the plaintiff would pay half of the expenses of the. campaign, and that in case of the defendant’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hayden v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. McAuliffe v. VaughanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  3. Meriwether v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871
  4. Basket v. . MossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  5. Horstman v. AdamsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Owens v. Floyd CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  2. MacNeill v. BazemoreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API