Legal Opinion

In Re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust Litigation

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 29, 2006No. MDL No. 1536. No. 03 C 4576PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JEFFREY COLE, United States Magistrate Judge.

I

INTRODUCTION AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND

For a variety of psychological and perfectly sound institutional reasons, motions for reconsideration are viewed with a measure of skepticism. But, even though generally disfavored, Bank of Waunakee v. Rochester Cheese Sales, Inc., 906 F.2d 1185, 1191 (7th Cir.1990); Quaker Alloy Casting Co. v. Gulfco Industries, Inc., 123 F.R.D. 282, 288 (N.D.Ill.1988)(Shadur, J.), motions for reconsideration can serve a valuable function by helping, under appropriate circumstances, to ensure judicial…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Southland Lloyds Insurance Company v. David Onofre Cantu and Guadalupe Cantu, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011
  2. Wilson Ex Rel. Adams v. Cahokia School District 187District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2007
  3. Day v. GentryUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2023
  4. Murphy v. RichertDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
  5. Sullivan v. BarwickDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API