In Re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JEFFREY COLE, United States Magistrate Judge.
I
INTRODUCTION AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND
For a variety of psychological and perfectly sound institutional reasons, motions for reconsideration are viewed with a measure of skepticism. But, even though generally disfavored, Bank of Waunakee v. Rochester Cheese Sales, Inc., 906 F.2d 1185, 1191 (7th Cir.1990); Quaker Alloy Casting Co. v. Gulfco Industries, Inc., 123 F.R.D. 282, 288 (N.D.Ill.1988)(Shadur, J.), motions for reconsideration can serve a valuable function by helping, under appropriate circumstances, to ensure judicial…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Southland Lloyds Insurance Company v. David Onofre Cantu and Guadalupe Cantu, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011
- Wilson Ex Rel. Adams v. Cahokia School District 187District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2007
- Day v. GentryUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2023
- Murphy v. RichertDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
- Sullivan v. BarwickDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024