Legal Opinion

Butcher v. Cappon & Bertsch Leather Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1907No. Docket No. 78PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Certiorari to Missaukee; Chittenden, J. Attachment proceedings by John F. Butcher and Elisha H. Hunter, copartners as John F. Butcher & Company, against the Cappon & Bertsch Leather Company. There was an order denying a motion to quash, and defendant brings certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

Plaintiffs are copartners, doing business under the firm name of John F. Butcher & Co., at Moorestown, Missaukee county. Defendant is a corporation with its office and principal place of business at Holland, in Ottawa county. On January 17, 1906, plaintiffs caused a writ of attachment to be issued out of the circuit court of Missaukee county and to be levied upon a quantity of tan bark in said county belonging to defendant. The affidavit for the writ was made by Elisha H. Hunter, • one of the plaintiffs, and alleged, among other things, that “ the. defendant named in said writ, Cappon &■…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bunneman & Martononi v. WagnerOregon Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Hill v. HardingIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Thompson v. ThomasMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Paddock v. MatthewsMichigan Supreme Court · 1853
  5. Freer v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Britton v. GoodmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. Bishop-Babcock-Becker Co. v. HydeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Fraser v. Collier Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. McGurrin Sales Agency v. Jackson Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Jim Causley Pontiac Inc. v. World Wide Auto Leasing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API