Legal Opinion

Hollick v. McDaniel

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 3, 1965No. 41178PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBIRD, Justice.

The present action was instituted upon an application by petitioner, Mrs. Hollick, for a writ of habeas corpus directing respondent, Mrs. McDaniel, to bring into court Franki Ann Cocanougher, petitioner’s nine-year-old daughter by her divorced husband, Frank M. Cocanougher. Respondent is Cocanougher’s 66-year-old mother.

Petitioner and Cocanougher, who was her second husband, were married in 1952. The first year of their marriage they lived with respondent. In 1956, they moved to Houston, Texas, where, shortly thereafter, petitioner became a laboratory assistant for a doctor…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wear v. WearSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  2. Jamison v. Gilbert Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Bishop v. BenearSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Clampitt v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  5. Motichka v. RollandsWashington Supreme Court · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Welfare of SegoWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  2. In the Matter of the Guardianship of M.R.S.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  3. Application of GroverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  4. Application of PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  5. Duncan v. SeaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API