Legal Opinion

Wear v. Wear

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 8, 1930No. 29,309PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an appeal by respondent in a proceeding for habeas corpus brought for the custody of a child. The petitioner is the mother and respondent is the father of the child in question. The point presented is that of the domicile of the child, and appellant’s complaint is that the trial court followed the decree of the court of another state, deeming itself bound by such decree, instead of trying out the issue presented by the pleadings, among which was that of the domicile of the child.

The facts disclosed by the record pertinent to our…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Haddock v. HaddockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Finlay v. FinlayNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Mercein v. People ex rel. BarryNew York Supreme Court · 1840
  4. Commonwealth v. DavenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Kenner v. KennerTennessee Supreme Court · 1917

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Minick v. MinickSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. Boone v. BooneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  3. Boardman v. BoardmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  4. Lake v. LakeWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Adamson v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API