Legal Opinion

Wertz v. Oliver Township School District

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 18, 1910No. Appeal, No. 13PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal, No. 13, March T., 1910, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Perry Co., Nov. T., 1908, No. 16, for plaintiff on case tried by the court without a jury in suit of H. W. Wertz v. School District of Oliver Township. Case tried by the court without a jury. Before Shull, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was the judgment of the court in entering judgment for plaintiff for $17.85.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Beaveb, J.,

The plaintiff was allowed to recover in the court below, in which the case was tried without a jury, the sum of $17.85 amount of tuition paid by him to the school district of the borough of Newport for tuition for his son for the years 1907-1908. His claim was for the sum of $75.09 for the years 1905-1906, 1906-1907 and 1907-1908. The court’s second conclusion of law, however, was “That plaintiff is not entitled to recover in this action the moneys paid for the years 1905-1906 or 1906-7.” The appeal is by the defendant township, which claims that the court should have…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth ex rel. Bowman v. SliferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1855
  2. Danville State Hospital for the Insane v. Bellefonte Borough Overseers of the PoorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  3. Hughesville Borough School District v. Wolf Township School DistrictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fegley v. Willistown Township School District, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API