Samia v. Ballard
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
A threshhold question presented by this case is whether an order denying motion for directed verdict following a mistrial is appealable. We conclude that it is not appealable and that it is therefore subject to dismissal.
In a majority of jurisdictions which have considered this question, absent statutory provision to the contrary, orders of this kind have been held nonappealable. The decisions are primarily based on the reasoning that such orders are interlocutory and do not affect a substantial right of the movant. Compare Basciano v. Reinecke, 313 F. 2d 542 (2d Cir. 1963), and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Summey v. CauthenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Ford Motor Co. v. Busam Motor Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
- Dostal v. Baltimore & O. R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Gennaro Basciano v. J. A. Reinecke, Bremen, Germany and Partenreederei M/s FalkentalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Burns v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Arkansas, Inc. v. Running M Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2002