Legal Opinion

Atkins v. Hooker

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1940No. Civil No. 4243PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.

The appellants, husband and wife, to whom we shall hereafter refer as plaintiffs, brought this action to condemn a private way of necessity over defendant Ralph C. Hooker’s lands, through which their cattle might pass from plaintiffs’ premises onto the public domain, to graze thereon. At the trial the other defendants were dismissed, it appearing that after the action was brought defendant Hooker acquired the land sought to be condemned. The court heard the case and denied plaintiffs the right to condemn for the purposes stated, and they have appealed.

The plaintiffs are the patentees of…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cienega Cattle Co. v. AtkinsArizona Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Tidwell v. State Ex Rel. HermanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  3. Stevens v. StevensArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Smith v. AlmidaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API