Legal Opinion
Max-George v. Ashcroft
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided February 24, 2000No. 98-21090PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Per curiam
Prince Dwight Max-George (“Max-George”) appeals the district court’s dismissal of his habeas corpus petition for lack of jurisdiction. The respondents, Attorney General Janet Reno and INS Deputy Director Richard Cravener (collectively “the government”) raise several procedural objections to Max-George’s appeal. We agree with one of the government’s arguments and dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
I
Prince Dwight Max-George is a thirty-year-old native and citizen of Sierra Leone. He entered the United States in 1972 when he was four years old. On May 23, 1988, Max-George committed a…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Felker v. TurpinSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Lee Moi Chong v. District Director, Immigration & Naturalization Service, Andrea QuarantilloCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Andres Flores-Miramontes,petitioner v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Gary Steele v. J. Scott Blackman, Ins, District Director for Philadelphia DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Vasquez v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.