Hunter v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
PATTERSON, Judge.
Hunter appeals from the trial court’s summary denial of his pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus wherein he alleges that he was denied his due process guarantees in the prison disciplinary committee’s finding that he was guilty of violating the prison regulation prohibiting possession of contraband. There is no question that Hunter’s liberty interests were diminished; he was sentenced to twenty-one days’ disciplinary segregation. See Summerford v. State, 466 So.2d 182 (Ala.Cr.App.1985).
After reviewing all allegations in Hunter’s petition, we find that only the following…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Summerford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
- Barker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
- Rice v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Atmore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
- Daughtry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
- Reynolds v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997