Gray v. Willcox
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Oakland. (Stickney, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtOhamplin, J.
This suit was brought before a justice of the peace to recover the amount claimed to be due upon a promissory note made by the defendant, payable to order of F. Gray, O’Ferrell & Co., and bearing date October 3d, 1876. The parties appeared on the return-day of the summons, when the plaintiffs declared orally on the common counts in assumpsit, and specially upon the note, and filed the same with the justice as a part of their declaration. The plaintiffs were described in the summons and declaration as Francis Gray, William O. Gray and Homer O. Nellis, a firm doing business under the firm name…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Galloway v. CorbittMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Erie Preserving Co. v. WitherspoonMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fowler v. FowlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
- Stoll v. PadleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Thomas Canning Co. v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Dillon v. HoweMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- School District No. 3 v. GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.