Legal Opinion

Gray v. Willcox

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1885PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Oakland. (Stickney, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtOhamplin, J.

This suit was brought before a justice of the peace to recover the amount claimed to be due upon a promissory note made by the defendant, payable to order of F. Gray, O’Ferrell & Co., and bearing date October 3d, 1876. The parties appeared on the return-day of the summons, when the plaintiffs declared orally on the common counts in assumpsit, and specially upon the note, and filed the same with the justice as a part of their declaration. The plaintiffs were described in the summons and declaration as Francis Gray, William O. Gray and Homer O. Nellis, a firm doing business under the firm name…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Galloway v. CorbittMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Erie Preserving Co. v. WitherspoonMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fowler v. FowlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  2. Stoll v. PadleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Thomas Canning Co. v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Dillon v. HoweMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  5. School District No. 3 v. GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API