Legal Opinion
Thomas Canning Co. v. Johnson
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 21, 1920No. Docket No. 2PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Error to Kent; Brown (William B.), J. Assumpsit by the Thomas Canning Company against Grafton Johnson for breach of a contract. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.
On January 12, 1915, the plaintiff, a corporation doing business at Grand Rapids, and defendant, a resident of Greenwood, Indiana, entered into a contract in writing whereby the defendant sold to plaintiff “Twelve thousand dozen No. 10 Tomato Pulp at the Fame Canning Company’s plant, at Tipton, Ind., at $1.75 per dozen, F. O. B. cars, Tipton, Ind.” The other provisions of the .contract material to the issue here presented are as follows:
“Shipments: To be made as ordered. All of the goods to be shipped by Dec. 1st, 1915. * * *
“Storage: Seller agrees to store pulp free of charge until ordered…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Anvil Mining Co. v. HumbleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Cofrode v. GartnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Wigent v. MarrsMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Goodrich v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Day v. W a Foote Memorial HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Kennedy v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- Insurance Company of North America v. Northwestern National Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Congresshills Apartments v. Township of YpsilantiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Rees v. R. A. Bowers Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.