Legal Opinion

Fenner v. Cahn

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1933PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

In this action, tried by the court without a jury, the plaintiffs, stockbrokers, seek to recover on a guaranty, where-under the defendant Cahn guaranteed the marginal trading account of plaintiffs’ customer, Hagop Kevorkian. Kevorkian was not sued by the plaintiffs. Cahn, however, pursuant to subdivision 2 of section 193 of the Civil Practice Act, has brought him in as a party. Cahn asserts a counterclaim against the plaintiffs, predicated upon the alleged conversion by the plaintiffs of Kevorkian’s securities, and asks that, in the event the plaintiffs recover against him (Cahn), judgment be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. . BackusNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Wallace v. . StrausNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Richardson v. . County of SteubenNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Municipal Service Real Estate Co. v. D. B. & M. Holding Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Bennett v. . DraperNew York Court of Appeals · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McGee v. F. W. Poe Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API