State v. Anderson

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 126,770 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. TAKOTA ANDERSON, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. K.S.A. 22-3216(2) contains three key components imposing respective duties on the defendant, the prosecution, and the district court. If a defendant fails to "state facts" alleging "the search and seizure were unlawful," the obligations of the prosecution and the district court are not triggered. 2. K.S.A. 22-3216(2) requires that a suppression motion identify specific factual circumstances and explain why those circumstances render the search or seizure…