Legal Opinion

Wright v. Borthwick

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1937No. Nos. 2285, 2286, 2287, 2288, 2289PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

COKE, C. J.

In 1935 the territorial legislature enacted a general excise tax law which levied a privilege tax of one and one-quarter per cent of gross income against persons, firms and corporations derived from businesses or activities carried on within the Territory for gain or economic benefit. Included within the scope of the Act were retailers, wholesalers, producers, contractors, theaters, amusement parks, radio broadcasting stations, printers and publishers, etc. (See Act 141, L. 1935.) By section 2-1-G of the Act all persons engaged in the practice of a profession…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. LawsSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. United States v. Buffalo Natural Gas Fuel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. Attorney-General v. FitlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kamalu v. Paren, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  2. McCaw Keating v. Tax Com'r FaseHawaii Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Pratt v. KondoHawaii Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API