Legal Opinion
State v. Roth
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided February 21, 1992No. 910100-CAPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RUSSON, Judge:
Frank Roth appeals the lower court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence that he was driving while intoxicated, in violation of Utah Code Ann. § 41-6-44 (1988). We affirm.
I. FACTS
On December 10, 1989, Frank Roth was arrested for driving while under the influence of alcohol after his vehicle was stopped by a University of Utah police officer. The stop was made on the basis of a police dispatch reporting a drunk driver, as well as the arresting officer’s own observations.
Prior to the arrest, Roth had accompanied a female friend to the emergency room at University…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. HensleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Whiteley v. Warden, Wyoming State PenitentiarySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. LaroccoUtah Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. MendozaUtah Supreme Court · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. KohlUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- Kaysville City v. MulcahyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
- State v. TraneUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. SepulvedaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
- State v. HumphreyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.