Legal Opinion

State v. Mendoza

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1987No. 20922PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

The State brought this appeal to challenge the trial court’s suppression of evidence obtained during a search of the car in which defendants were traveling. The State assigns as error the trial court’s use of a probable cause standard to determine the validity of the stop, the trial court’s *182finding that defendants had standing to challenge the validity of the search, and the trial court’s failure to make findings pursuant to Utah Code Ann. § 77-35-12(g) (1982). We affirm.

The following summary of the facts is based on testimony from both the suppression hearing and the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. RamirezUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. SeryCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  4. Ferris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. State v. LopezUtah Supreme Court · 1994

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API