Four v. US Ex Rel. Bureau of Indian Affairs
District Court, D. North Dakota
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HOVLAND, Chief Judge.
Before the Court is the defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment filed on March 1, 2006. The United States asserts that it is immune from suit under the discretionary function exception to the Federal Tort Claims Act. For reasons outlined below, the Court grants the motion.
I. BACKGROUND
The following facts are undisputed. The plaintiff, Patricia Four (“Four”), brought this wrongful death action as the surviving spouse of Eugene Four, a 74-year-old man who was killed in a two-vehicle accident caused by a drunk driver,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Phil Quick v. Donaldson Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Ronald Pooler v. United States of America. Ronnie Bradley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Bourassa v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2023