Legal Opinion

Blairsville Boro. v. Donatelli

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 1936No. Appeal, 205PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.;

This is an appeal from the order of the learned court below making absolute a rule to strike off a municipal lien.

The facts, which are not in dispute, may be briefly stated, as follows:

On April 2, 1928, the borough of Blairsville filed a municipal paving claim, naming D. Donatelli as owner or reputed owner, for the sum of $290.04, with interest from October 20, 1927. The property against which the lien was filed was described as follows: “Bounded on the north by Artley Alley; on the east by an alley; on the south by property of Joseph Prola; and on the west by South…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Prouty v. MarshallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  2. Apollo Borough v. ClepperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  3. Spramelli v. Boro. of PunxsutawneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Borough of Towanda ex rel. Shaffer v. BrannakaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. McLean v. City of Philadelphia, Dept. of Revenue (In Re McLean)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Dickson City Borough v. SenkoskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Litmans v. O'DONNELLSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. St. Clair Savings & Trust Co. v. GroeschelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API