Legal Opinion

St. Clair Savings & Trust Co. v. Groeschel

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 1, 1939No. Appeal, 205PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

On December 3, 1925, certain real estate was conveyed to defendants Conrad Groeschel and Johanna Groeschel, husband and wife, and the deed was duly recorded. It must also be conceded that this deed was registered in the deed registry office of Allegheny County. On October 27, 1926, the defendants gave a mortgage for $5,000, a first lien on this real estate, to St. Clair Savings and Trust Company which was later assigned to use plaintiffs. On February 25, 1930, the City of Pittsburgh filed a municipal lien in the name of “Conrad Groetschel et ux.” for municipal improvements…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beihl v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  2. Alles v. LyonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  3. Colonial Trust Co. Tr. v. L. D. A. Corp. K. W. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Blairsville Boro. v. DonatelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dickson City Borough v. SenkoskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Litmans v. O'DONNELLSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. City of Hazleton v. Forte, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1949
  4. Lancaster County v. Rose, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1948
  5. Lawrence Park Township v. Nacera, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Erie County1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API