Legal Opinion

State v. Logsdon

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 4, 1933No. 41627PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKintzinger, J.

— This is an action brought by the state of Iowa under the provisions of section 3046 of the 1931 Code, asking that the defendant be enjoined and restrained from continuing in the business of an itinerant vendor of drugs, without obtaining a license under the provisions of section 3149 of the present Code. The plaintiff’s petition alleges that the defendant is charged by the state department of health and the hoard of pharmacy commissioners with practicing as an itinerant vendor of drugs in the state of Iowa without first having secured a license so to do; that the said defendant has been and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Dobbins v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. In Re RahrerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. State v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  4. Quackenbush v. Wisconsin & Minnesota RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  5. State v. OsborneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gilchrist v. BierringSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  2. Central States Theatre Corporation v. SarSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  3. Plaza Recreational Center v. City of Sioux CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  4. Racing Ass'n of Central Iowa v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  5. Racing Ass'n of Central Iowa v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API