Legal Opinion

Rice v. University of Maryland Medical System Corp.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 6, 2009No. 2870, September Term, 2007PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMeredith, J.

In Walzer v. Osborne, 395 Md. 563, 585, 911 A.2d 427 (2006), the Court of Appeals held: “Because [the claimant had] failed to attach the expert report to the certificate of qualified expert in a timely manner, the trial court was required to dismiss [the] medical malpractice claim.” When the Walzer decision was announced, the appellants in the present appeal were in the midst of pursuing claims based upon alleged medical negligence. They had won a substantial verdict in one jury trial, but a new trial had been ordered. Relying upon Walzer, the appellee, University of Maryland Medical System…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. KinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Myers v. KayhoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. Dua v. Comcast Cable of Maryland, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Walzer v. OsborneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  5. Slate v. ZitomerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kearney v. BergerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. Puppolo v. Adventist Healthcare, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  3. Dundore v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024
  4. Kearney v. BergerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API