Rice v. University of Maryland Medical System Corp.
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtMeredith, J.
In Walzer v. Osborne, 395 Md. 563, 585, 911 A.2d 427 (2006), the Court of Appeals held: “Because [the claimant had] failed to attach the expert report to the certificate of qualified expert in a timely manner, the trial court was required to dismiss [the] medical malpractice claim.” When the Walzer decision was announced, the appellants in the present appeal were in the midst of pursuing claims based upon alleged medical negligence. They had won a substantial verdict in one jury trial, but a new trial had been ordered. Relying upon Walzer, the appellee, University of Maryland Medical System…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. KinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Myers v. KayhoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Dua v. Comcast Cable of Maryland, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Walzer v. OsborneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Slate v. ZitomerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kearney v. BergerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Puppolo v. Adventist Healthcare, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Dundore v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024
- Kearney v. BergerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010