Legal Opinion

Bryan v. Tevis

California Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1918No. S. F. No. 8548PublishedCited by 1 opinion

MOTION to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Bernard J. Flood, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, C. J.

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment on the ground that appellant has failed to file his transcript on appeal within the time prescribed by our rules. (Rules II and V, [160 Cal. xlii, xlvi, 119 Pac. ix, x].) The appeal was taken May 13, 1914, from a judgment entered March 16, 1914, notice of intention to move for a new trial “upon a statement of the case” to be thereafter' prepared, having been given and filed April 24, 1914. No transcript has ever been filed. Under the rules hereinbefore referred to the forty-day period within which appellant could file his transcript did…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lang v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Galbraith v. LoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Murphy v. StellingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Dorcy v. BrodisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Miller v. Queen InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hughes v. De MundCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API