Legal Opinion

Mayer Furniture Co. v. Putt

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County

Decided January 31, 1923No. 603Published

1Opinion of the Court

Fox, J.,

In this case the defendants presented a petition, praying for a rule upon the plaintiff to show cause why the execution issued should not be stayed and the judgment stricken off. The petition averred, *543in substance, that the transcript filed' in the original judgment to No. 109, January Term, 1906, discloses that the original judgment was void for these reasons, viz.: That it did not show the cause of action; that any proofs and allegations were heard; that witnesses were sworn to support the claim, and that judgment was publicly rendered. Whereupon a rule was granted in accordance…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Long v. Lemoyne BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  2. Dorrance v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838
  3. Breden v. GillilandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
  4. Pantall v. DickeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  5. Johnson v. Royal InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API