Legal Opinion

Peterman v. Midwestern National Insurance

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided June 15, 1993No. 91-2717, 92-0050PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWedemeyer, P.J.

John D. Peterman and Kathy J. Peterman (the Petermans) appeal from a judgment dismissing their complaint against Special Products, Inc. (Special Products), and Frank A. *687Busalacchi (Busalacchi). The Petermans also appeal from a judgment dismissing their complaint against Visuals Plus, Inc. (Visuals).

Midwestern National Insurance Company (MNIC) cross-appeals from a judgment dismissing its cross-claim against Special Products and Busalacchi for indemnification. This is a consolidated appeal.

The Petermans assert the following: (1) the trial court erred in ordering summary judgment in favor of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  5. District of Columbia v. Greater Washington Board of TradeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Maxwell v. Hartford Union High School DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Hauer v. Union State Bank of WautomaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
  3. Scheideler Ex Rel. Tlusty v. Smith & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
  4. Darne v. State of WisconsinDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1995
  5. Buchholz v. Rural Community InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API