Legal Opinion

County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 23, 2020No. 18-260PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breyer

*1468The Clean Water Act forbids the "addition" of any pollutant from a "point source" to "navigable waters" without the appropriate permit from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Federal Water Pollution Control Act, §§ 301(a), 502(12)(A), as amended by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972 (Clean Water Act) § 2, 86 Stat. 844, 886, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1311(a), 1362(12)(A). The question presented here is whether the Act "requires a permit when pollutants originate from a point source but are conveyed to navigable waters by a nonpoint source," here, "groundwater." Pet. for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. City of Milwaukee v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Loper Bright Enterprises v. RaimondoSupreme Court of the United States · 2024
  2. Prairie Rivers Network v. Dynegy Midwest Generation, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
  3. Stevens v. St. Tammany Parish GovtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
  4. Inland Empire Waterkeeper v. Corona Clay Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  5. Dept. of Env. v. Assateague Coastal TrustCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API