Sanger Bros. v. Corsicana National Bank
Texas Supreme Court
Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Third District, in an appeal from Eavarro County. For the previous history of this case see Baum v. Sanger, 49 S. W. Rep., 650; Weaver v. Goodman, 51 S. W. Rep., 860; Corsicana Eational Bank v. Baum, 62 S. W. Rep., 812; Baum v. Corsicana Eational Bank, 75 S. W. Rep., 863.
1Opinion of the Court
GAINES, Chief Justice.
This action was brought by the Corsicana National Bank against Sanger Bros, and I. Baum, to revive a judgment. The revival was sought by a -petition and not by a scire facias. The plaintiff recovered a judgment from which the Sanger Bros, appealed to the Court of Civil Appeals, making the bank and Baum obligees in their appeal bond. The judgment was by that court in all things affirmed. Sanger Bros, have 'sued out a writ of error to this court.
The present action was the result of a long protracted and complicated litigation.
For a proper understanding of the points…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Holland Texas Hypotheek Bank v. BroocksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Bishop v. SanfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Coombes v. WheelerSupreme Court of Florida · 1938