Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bank of Washington v. McAuliffe

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 11, 1984No. 65613Published

1Dissent

JAMES A. FINCH, Jr., Senior Judge,

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent. For reasons subsequently recited I would hold that Earl L. Manning had no right or authority on September 19, 1980, to issue a bank charter. Hence, I would reverse and remand the decision of the Circuit Court with directions.

It is clear that persons appointed as director of finance require senate confirmation. The position is created by § 361.040, RSMo which provides that such officer “shall be appointed by the governor by and with the advice and consent of the senate and shall hold his office at the pleasure of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Inf. Ashcroft Ex Rel. Bell v. City of FultonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  2. State ex inf. Hadley v. HerringSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  3. Lovins v. City of St. Louis.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  4. Ederer v. DaltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  5. State v. StoverSuperior Court of Delaware · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API