Legal Opinion

Kaminski v. Kaminski

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1975PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLouis B. Heller, J.

In this matrimonial action defendant-respondent moves to proceed as a poor person and to have counsel assigned to represent him, and if the motion is granted to extend the time for defendant’s counsel to appear until 20 days after the entry of the order hereon.

Defendant has made a sufficient showing to proceed as a poor person. However, there is no obligation on the part of local government to compensate assigned counsel in matrimonial actions. (Jacox v Jacox, 43 AD2d 716; Smiley v Smiley, 45 AD2d 785.)

Absent statutory authority for the payment of assigned counsel in matrimonial actions and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jacox v. JacoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  2. Smiley v. SmileyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Attorney's Fees of Mohr v. PowersHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Attorney's Fees of Mohr v. PowersHawaii Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API