Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Clark v. Quinn

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 28, 1916No. Nos. 19,670—(261)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Upon the relation of Almond B. Clark this court granted an alternative writ of mandamus directed to the judge and clerk of the district court for Martin county, to transfer the files and records of the ease of Morrow v. Clark to the district court for Hennepin county or show cause why they had not done so. The respondents made return and moved to quash the writ.

1Opinion of the CourtBunn, J.

Mandamus directed to the respondents, judge and clerk, respectively, of the district court for Martin county, to compel them to change the place of trial of an action brought in that county by Christine Morrow, as plaintiff, against Almond B. Clark and the city of Fairmont, as defendants. Bespondents made return to the alternative writ and moved to quash.

The facts are as follows: Plaintiff in the action sought to be trans*220ferred is a resident of Martin county, as is defendant city of Fairmont. Defendant Clark resides in Hennepin county. The action was to recover for personal injuries sustained…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Johnson v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  2. Scott v. Miller Liquor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. Roesler v. Union Hay Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Winegar v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  2. Singer v. MandtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API