Legal Opinion

New England Oil & Pipe Line Co. v. Broyles

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 5, 1922No. 10651PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This is an appeal from the district court of Payne county; Hon. John P. Hickam, Judge.

On July 2, 1918, the defendants in error, W. O. Broyles and wife, filed their petition in the district court of Payne county, against the New England Oil & Pipe Line Company, the Fortuna Oil Company, the Charleston Oil Company, and D. A. Wiek-heiser, defendants, alleging substantially that the plaintiffs therein were residents of Payne county, Okla.; that the Charleston Oil Company was a corporation organized and created under the laws of West Virginia ; the Fortuna Oil Company, an Oklahoma corporation, and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Stone v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Crehore v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Whitcomb v. SmithsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hinton v. SaulWyoming Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. WittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Board of Com'rs of Kiowa County v. Kiowa Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Crenshaw v. Southern Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  5. New York Life Ins. Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API