Legal Opinion

Vance Shoe Co. v. Haught

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1895PublishedCited by 53 opinions

cited 4 R. 1.173; 10 R. I. 105; 138 U. S. 104; Sto. Eq. Plead. §§ 251, 252; Wait. Fraud. C. & C. Bills (2nd Ed.) ⅜§ 8, 9, 10,' 11; 37 W. Va. 526-63; 2 Big. Fraud. 473, 488, 496; 31 Am. Dec. 468.

1Opinion of the Court

BraNnoN, Judge:

Vance Shoe Company and others filed in the Circuit Court of Wetzel county a bill in equity against William Ilaught and others, alleging his indebtedness to it and various others creditors, and that he had confessed fraudulent judgments in favor of David Ilaught and one Rice, under which, by execution, a stock of goods had been sold, and purchased by David Ilaught, and that William Ilaught owned a house and lot conveyed to him by Brookover; and the bill prayed that the judgments and execution sale under them be held fraudulent, that Rice and Ilaught beheld for the price the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lockhard v. BeckleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Roberts v. ColemanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Shrewsbury v. MillerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Zell Guano Co. v. HeatherlyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Pickens v. KniselyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1886

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Waldron v. HarveyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Potts v. Mathieson Alkali WorksSupreme Court of Virginia · 1935
  3. Cato v. SillingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Ward v. BrownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. State ex rel. Cecil v. KnappWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1958

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API