Legal Opinion

Tri-County Excavating, Inc. v. Borough of Kingston

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 1979No. Appeal, No. 773 C.D. 1978PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

The Luzerne County Common Pleas Court modified an arbitrator’s award in favor of Tri-County Excavating, Inc. (Tri-County) upon petition by the Borough of Kingston. Tri-County claimed it was contractually entitled to reimbursement for allegedly unforeseen subsurface conditions encountered in connection with a sewer construction project, namely, unforeseen mine water, utility lines, and a storm main. The arbitrators awarded Tri-County $163,500.00 plus interest. The court below concluded that the arbitrators erred in awarding reimbursement for the mine water problem…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Commonwealth v. Acchioni & Canuso, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Branna Construction Corp. v. West Allegheny Joint School AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. Litton RCS, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Acchione and Canuso v. COM., DEPT. OF TR.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Acchione and Canuso v. COM., DEPT. OF TR.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API