Legal Opinion · Dissent

Acchione and Canuso v. COM., DEPT. OF TR.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 25, 1983No. 81-3-406Published

1DissentNix, Justice

I dissent. The majority’s conclusion is based on a misreading of this Court’s holding in Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. Smith, 350 Pa. 355, 39 A.2d 139 (1944), and fosters the erosion of both the competitive bidding process for public contracts and the binding effect of such contracts.

*346Smith clearly requires that, to permit recovery on the basis of constructive fraud, the misrepresentation must be “substantial and not mere inaccuracy or innocent mistake.” Id., 350 Pa. at 362, 39 A.2d at 142. As this Court explained in Branna Construction Corp. v. West Allegheny Joint School Authority, 430…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Commonwealth v. Acchioni & Canuso, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. S. J. Groves & Sons Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Montgomery v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Branna Construction Corp. v. West Allegheny Joint School AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API