Legal Opinion
Zabel v. Tabb
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided February 17, 1969No. Civ. 67-200PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KRENTZMAN, District Judge.
This case involves Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act, 1899, 30 Stat. 1151, 33 U.S.C. § 403 (1964) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act of 1958, 48 Stat. 401, as amended, 16 U.S.C. § 661 et seq. (1964).
The parties suggest and research of the court indicates that this is a case of first impression.
Plaintiffs applied for Department of the Army permit to dredge and fill in navigable waters under Section 9 of the Rivers and Harbors Act. Defendants denied the application and plaintiffs seek relief in one of several ways.
After denial of motion for lack…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cummings v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- United States Ex Rel. Greathouse v. DernSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Udall v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Zabel v. Pinellas County Water & Nav. Con. Auth.Supreme Court of Florida · 1965
- General Motors Corporation v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, and New York Central Railroad Co., InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Zabel v. TabbCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Deltona Corp. v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Giberson v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
- Kliebert Educ. Trust v. Watson Marines Serv., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
- American Federation of Government Employees v. HoffmannDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.