General Motors Corporation v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, and New York Central Railroad Co., Intervening
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
In a proceeding before the Interstate Commerce Commission, Plaintiff-Appellant, General Motors Corporation, contended that the proper rail tariff to be applied to its shipments of “bumper back bars” and “stabilizer bars” should be that published for “forgings” instead of a higher tariff for “automobile parts.” The Commission found against it. It appeals here from the District Court’s dismissal of its complaint whereby it sought to have the order of the Commission set aside.
The articles involved are manufactured in a forging process. They are made to specifications required for installation in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. Gulf Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- General Motors Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1962
- General Motors Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
- Great Lakes Steel Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
3Cited by13 opinions
- The Coca-Cola Company v. The Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Burlington Northern, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- McLean Trucking Company, Inc., a Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Di Vosta Rentals, Inc. v. Emmett C. Lee, Jr., Colonel, Corps of Engineers, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- National Gypsum Co.(Huron Cement Div.) v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.