Platte Pipe Line Co. v. United States
District Court, D. Wyoming
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT UNITED STATES’ MOTION TO DISMISS
BRIMMER, District Judge.
The above-entitled matter came before the Court upon a motion to dismiss filed by the United States. The plaintiff was represented at oral argument by Patrick Dixon, Esq., the defendant United States by Francis Leland Pico, Esq., and the defendant Willwood Irrigation District was not represented at the hearing. The Court has reviewed the briefs filed in this case and is now fully advised in the premises.
The relevant facts for the purpose of this motion are not disputed. The Department of the Interior entered a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Watt v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Sylvia H. Thompson v. Clark M. Clifford, as Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Robert Edward ReebCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Union Petroleum Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- The People of the Territory of Guam v. Edwin A. QuinataCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Platte Pipe Line Company, a Delaware Corporation v. United States of America and Willwood Irrigation District, a Wyoming CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- A/S D/S Svendborg v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987