Legal Opinion

Ling v. Herrod

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided August 3, 2006No. 04-2484 Ma/PPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PENDING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MAYS, District Judge.

Before the court are two motions for summary judgment. On December 6, 2005, Plaintiffs Frank W. Ling, M.D. (“Ling”), Robert L. Summitt, M.D. (“Sum-mitt”), and Val Y. Vogt, M.D. (“Vogt”) filed a motion for partial summary judgment. Defendants Henry G. Herrod, M.D. (“Her-rod”), individually and in his capacity as Dean of the College of Medicine at University of Tennessee Health Science Center (“UTHSC”); Owen Phillips, M.D. (“Phillips”), in his capacity as Chair of the Department of Obstetrics and…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. ARP II v. INDIANA STATE POLICEDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API