State v. Jones
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
FRYE, Justice.
We find one issue dispositive in this case. Defendant argues that the admission into evidence of past acts of sexual misconduct by defendant, though arguably similar to those of the case sub judice, was improper under the North Carolina Rules of Evidence because the prior acts were so remote in time that their probative effect was outweighed by the prejudice visited upon him. We agree and accordingly order a new trial.
An exhaustive recitation of the circumstances surrounding this appeal is unnecessary to its disposition. In short, defendant was indicted and convicted of two…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. DeLeonardoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. CottonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Cooper v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- State v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- State v. BeckelheimerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
- State v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- State v. Al-BayyinahSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. WinterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.